CONSTRUCTION INTELLIGENCE / PAY APPLICATIONS
Send your schedule of values and progress data. Mirage builds the AIA G702/G703 pay application, every line traced to its source, ready to submit in 48 hours once you're live (production deployment is under four weeks — see FAQ).
Running at OCBM and a US rail contractor.
THE REALITY
A monthly pay application means reconciling a schedule of values against real progress by hand, one line at a time, then defending every number to a GC or owner who's looking for a reason to push it back. The rework costs more time than the application itself.
The same traceability discipline extends to prevailing wage compliance and CSI MasterFormat classification — two more places where a document-level record answers a question before it gets asked.
WHAT MIRAGE DOES
01
Mirage reads your schedule of values and current progress, and generates the G702 summary and G703 continuation sheet, retainage and stored materials tracked as their own line items.
02
Each percentage-complete figure links back to the underlying quantity or progress record it came from, the same traceability discipline already running on our takeoff and consistency agents.
03
Billing figures are cross-checked against the schedule of values and the prior period. Anything that doesn't add up is surfaced before it reaches a GC or owner, connecting to Procore, Sage, and Autodesk Build.
THE OUTPUT
| Item | Scheduled Value | This Period | Total to Date | % Complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sitework & excavation | $420,000 | $0 | $420,000 | 100% |
| Concrete & foundations | $680,000 | $85,000 | $595,000 | 88% |
| Structural steel↳ This period's billing on structural steel is 12 points ahead of the last recorded progress update. Flagged for the PM to confirm before this line is submitted. | $540,000 | $162,000 | $324,000 | 60% |
| MEP rough-in | $390,000 | $58,500 | $97,500 | 25% |
PROOF
OCBM
Measured quantities feed straight into structured, priced bills of quantities
100% of quantities traceable to a source drawing
3 agents in production across takeoff, pricing, and document consistency
US Rail Contractor
31 spec-to-plan inconsistencies caught before they reached a submission, over 7 months
Every flagged item routed to the responsible PM before it moved forward
0 required post-submission remediation on any flagged item
Send us a real schedule of values, and we'll show you exactly what the reconciled application looks like.
FAQ
No. It builds the pay application from your progress data and schedule of values, and traces every line back to its source. Your PM or accountant reviews and submits it.
Yes. Output matches the standard G702 summary and G703 continuation sheet format, ready to route for signature, or adapted to whatever pay application format your GC or owner requires.
Both are tracked as their own line items across the billing cycle, retainage percentage applied per your contract terms, stored materials carried until incorporated into completed work.
Yes. Percentage-complete figures are cross-checked against the schedule of values and prior period billing, and anything inconsistent, an amount that doesn't reconcile, a jump that doesn't match reported progress, is flagged before submission, not after a GC pushes back.
Yes. It connects to Procore, Sage, and Autodesk Build for schedule-of-values and billing history, or works from spreadsheets if that's what your team uses today.
Under four weeks on average for the production deployment itself: indexing your schedule of values and contract terms first, then a parallel pilot on one real billing cycle before full rollout. The 48-hour figure above is the turnaround on a single pay application once you're live — a different clock than the one-time deployment.
Pricing starts with a fixed-price pilot run on one real billing cycle, so you see the output before committing to anything larger. After that, it moves to an annual subscription priced by volume, quoted in your first conversation with us.