All Comparisons/Comparison

Comparison

STACK alternatives

Mirage vs STACK

STACK is a cloud takeoff and estimating platform for trade contractors and general contractors, from $299 per user a month, with AI auto-count, a plan room, estimates and proposals, and connectors to QuickBooks, Procore and Autodesk. Mirage is a forward-deployed takeoff agent: engineers deploy it on your drawing sets, it returns quantities traced to their sheet, and it feeds the estimating system you already use.

Published Last updated Vendor facts last verified

Short answer

Pick STACK if you are a trade contractor or estimator who wants a self-serve cloud tool to measure, price and send proposals from, with AI counting as an assist and a free trial to start today. Pick Mirage if bid volume or drawing complexity makes measuring itself the bottleneck, you want the quantities produced by an agent and traced to the sheet rather than measured by hand, and you want them inside the estimating system you already run.

Executive Summary

STACK sells four cloud products: Evaluate (plan and specification management), Takeoff ("automatically measure drawings digitally with speed and precision"), Estimate (pricing and proposals) and Build (field operations). It serves specialty contractors, general contractors, suppliers and manufacturers, and owners. Takeoff works on PDF and TIFF plans with tools for area, linear, arc, pitched, count and volume measurement, and its AI is described as "auto-counting symbols and suggesting scope you might miss" and "automatically identifying doors, windows, walls, and rooms within digital building plans". It also auto-organises plan sets, detects revisions and overlays drawing versions.

Pricing is public as of October 2026. Takeoff & Estimate is "as low as $299 per user / month", Build & Operate "as low as $49 per user / month" and the full STACK platform "as low as $348 per user / month", with a free version and a two-week trial. The pricing page does not say which tiers include the AI takeoff features. STACK's integrations page lists Acumatica, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, QuickBooks Desktop and Online, Procore (two integrations), Autodesk, Ediphi, FollowUp CRM, TopBuilder, Nearmap, Dodge Data, BidCentral, BNi cost data, Velixo (STACK for Excel) and Workpack, described as an AI takeoff engine, plus API access.

STACK is widely reviewed: Software Advice rates it 4.5 out of 5 on 1,399 reviews, with takeoff management, estimating and support (4.7) as the recurring strengths and price, navigation, performance on slow connections and the mobile app as the recurring criticisms. Named customers on its site include F.E. Moran, ABC Supply, Kiewit, Siemens, PCL, CentiMark and 5 Seasons Mechanical. Its stated outcomes ("revenue growth", "increase in bids won", "faster takeoffs") carry no published figures.

Mirage is a forward-deployed AI engineering company. Its takeoff agent reads plan, section and detail sheets together, on PDF, DWG and IFC files, and returns quantities with the source sheet attached, for your estimators to price in the system they already use. Mirage's engineers deploy it on your drawing sets and conventions and run it in production. The published results are from the John Cockerill case study, 80 to 90% less time on piping takeoff and a fabrication bill of materials ten times faster, and from OCBM, three agents in production with every quantity traceable to its source drawing. A proof of concept on your own drawings comes one week after the first meeting; the first workflow is in production in 4 to 6 weeks.

The difference is what the AI does. In STACK, AI counts symbols and suggests scope while the estimator measures and prices in STACK's own tools. In Mirage, the agent produces the quantities, a person reviews them before anything is priced, and the estimating system stays yours: Mirage maintains no material catalogue or labour database and does not replace STACK's estimate and proposal tools.

Key Takeaways

  • STACK is a self-serve cloud takeoff, estimating and proposal platform from $299 per user a month, with AI as a counting and scope assist.
  • Mirage is a forward-deployed takeoff agent that produces the quantities, traced to their sheet, and feeds your existing estimating system.
  • The John Cockerill case study reports 80 to 90% less time on piping takeoff with Mirage's agent; STACK publishes no takeoff-time figure.
  • STACK fits trade contractors who want one workspace and a trial; Mirage fits bid teams where measuring is the bottleneck.
  • STACK is widely reviewed (4.5/5 on 1,399 Software Advice reviews); Mirage's evidence is its published case studies.

At a Glance

AspectMirageSTACK
ModelForward-deployed takeoff agent, deployed by Mirage engineers on your drawing sets and wired into your estimating systemSelf-serve cloud takeoff, estimating, plan management and field platform, run by your team
Who it is forContractors, EPC and engineering groups with high bid volume or complex sets: piping MTO, ITO, French DCE, structural and MEP packagesTrade contractors first, plus general contractors, suppliers and owners; from one-person estimating desks to large firms
What the AI doesProduces the quantities from plan, section and detail sheets together, each traced to its sheet; a person reviews before pricingAuto-counts symbols, identifies doors, windows, walls and rooms, suggests scope; the estimator measures and prices in STACK
File typesPDF, DWG and IFC drawing setsPDF and TIFF plans
Estimating and proposalsNone of its own: quantities feed the estimating system you already use; no material catalogue or labour databaseBuilt in: estimates, proposals, BNi cost data, STACK for Excel
DeploymentProof of concept on your own drawings a week after the first meeting; first workflow in production in 4 to 6 weeksFree version and two-week trial; usable at signup
IntegrationsYour estimating software and ERP, wired by Mirage engineers; Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud among the systems connectedQuickBooks, Sage Intacct, Acumatica, Oracle NetSuite, Procore, Autodesk, Ediphi, FollowUp CRM, TopBuilder, Nearmap, Dodge, BidCentral, Velixo, Workpack; API access
Pricing modelFrom $10,000 to launch and $1,000 a month, the exact amount quoted in the first conversationTakeoff & Estimate from $299 per user a month; Build & Operate from $49; full platform from $348 (October 2026); AI tier inclusion not stated
Human reviewEvery quantity reviewed by your estimator before pricing; not a zero-human systemThe estimator does the measuring; AI counts and suggestions are checked in the same screen
Reported results80 to 90% less time on piping takeoff and a fabrication bill of materials ten times faster (John Cockerill); every quantity traceable to its drawing (OCBM)No published figures for takeoff time or accuracy; Software Advice 4.5/5 on 1,399 reviews

Key Differences

AI as assist vs AI as the measurer

STACK's AI counts symbols and flags scope while the estimator does the takeoff in STACK's tools: it speeds the work without changing who does it. Mirage's agent does the measuring, reading plan, section and detail sheets together, and the estimator's job becomes reviewing quantities that arrive with their source sheet attached. That is where the 80 to 90% figure at John Cockerill comes from.

A platform to work in vs a feed into the one you have

STACK is a complete preconstruction workspace: plan room, takeoff, estimate, proposal, and connectors to accounting. Mirage replaces none of that. It produces quantities and feeds them to the estimating system you already run, which could be STACK itself, an Excel workbook or a trade-specific estimating package.

Per user per month vs a scoped engagement

STACK publishes per-user prices and a free trial, so a single estimator can start for $299 a month. Mirage starts at $10,000 to launch and $1,000 a month, scoped to the drawing sets and volumes in the first conversation. For a one-estimator desk, STACK is the cheaper entry; for a bid team measuring the same kinds of sets every week, the comparison is the hours.

Set complexity

STACK's AI features name doors, windows, walls, rooms and symbol counts, the elements of a building plan. Mirage's published deployments are piping material take-off and fabrication bills of materials for an engineering group, and quantity takeoff with consistency checks across drawing revisions, DCE and CCTP for a contractor on French tenders. Different drawings, different buyers.

Advantages and Limitations

Mirage

Advantages

  • The agent produces the quantities, each traced to its source sheet, instead of assisting manual measurement
  • 80 to 90% less time on piping takeoff and a BOM ten times faster in a published case study (John Cockerill)
  • Reads PDF, DWG and IFC, and plan, section and detail sheets together
  • Feeds the estimating system you already use; engineers do the integration
  • Proof of concept on your own drawings a week after the first meeting

Limitations

  • No estimating, proposal or plan-room tools of its own; no cost database
  • Not self-serve: an engineering engagement, not a trial
  • Higher entry price than a single STACK seat
  • Does not check drawings against US building codes

STACK

Advantages

  • Published per-user pricing, a free version and a two-week trial
  • Takeoff, estimating, proposals and plan management in one cloud workspace
  • Long integration list: QuickBooks, Sage, Acumatica, NetSuite, Procore, Autodesk, BNi cost data, Excel
  • 4.5/5 on 1,399 Software Advice reviews, support rated 4.7
  • Named customers from F.E. Moran to Kiewit, Siemens and PCL

Limitations

  • AI counts and suggests; the estimator still measures
  • No published takeoff-time or accuracy figures
  • Which tiers include the AI takeoff features is not stated on the pricing page
  • Reviewers cite price, navigation and the mobile app as weak points

Real-World Use Cases

A roofing or painting contractor pricing a dozen jobs a month

PDF plans, area and count measurements, an estimate and a proposal out the door the same day, QuickBooks behind it: that is STACK's core customer, and the better fit. The AI count saves clicks; the rest of the workflow is already there.

An EPC contractor taking off piping from isometrics and P&IDs

Hundreds of sheets per bid, material take-off by line, spec and size, and a fabrication bill of materials to follow: Mirage's agent at John Cockerill cut piping takeoff time by 80 to 90% and produced the BOM ten times faster.

A contractor answering French public tenders

A DCE with its CCTP, DPGF and plans, quantities that must agree across drawing revisions, and every figure traceable to its sheet: the OCBM deployment, three agents in production. STACK publishes nothing for the French tender format.

A bid team that keeps STACK and wants the measuring done

The two are not exclusive. A team that estimates in STACK can have Mirage's agent produce the quantities from the drawing set and feed them in, keeping STACK's estimate and proposal tools. Which workflows that fits is settled in the proof of concept.

How to Choose

Start with what you want the AI to do. If a faster estimator in a good cloud tool is the goal, STACK's auto-count and scope suggestions do that, and the trial will show it within a day. If you want the measuring done by the agent and reviewed by the estimator, that is Mirage, and the proof of concept on your own drawings will show it within a week.

Then the workspace. If you need takeoff, estimate and proposal in one place with accounting behind it, STACK is that place. If you already have an estimating system you are keeping, Mirage feeds it and adds nothing to work in.

Then the drawings. Building plans with symbols to count are STACK's ground. Piping isometrics, engineering packages and French tender sets are where Mirage's published deployments sit.

When to pick which

Both read construction drawings. They part on who measures, what surrounds the takeoff and how the work is bought.

  • Pick STACK when you want a self-serve cloud workspace for takeoff, estimating and proposals, your plans are building sets in PDF, and a per-user subscription with a trial suits the size of the team.
  • Pick Mirage when measuring is the bottleneck, the sets are large or technical (piping, engineering, DCE), you want quantities traced to the sheet and fed into the estimating system you keep, and you want engineers to deploy and run it.
  • Pick neither when bid volume is a few sets a year and a markup tool with manual measurement already covers it, in which case the Bluebeam comparison is the one to read.

Where Mirage fits on US and UK projects

On US projects, Mirage reads US drawing sets and returns quantities traced to their sheet and detail for your estimators to price in the system they already use, and runs the document workflows around the bid and the job: CSI MasterFormat organisation, certified payroll against prevailing wage determinations and AIA G702/G703 pay applications. It does not check drawings against US building codes.

On UK projects, the quantities can be measured into an NRM2-structured bill for the quantity surveyor to price, and the contract side covers NEC4 administration.

Sources

  1. 01stackct.com, home page, accessed 7 October 2026
  2. 02stackct.com, pricing, accessed 7 October 2026
  3. 03stackct.com, Takeoff, accessed 7 October 2026
  4. 04stackct.com, integrations, accessed 7 October 2026
  5. 05Software Advice, STACK profile (4.5/5, 1,399 reviews), accessed 7 October 2026

FAQ

  • STACK is a cloud construction platform with four products: Evaluate for plan and specification management, Takeoff for digital measurement with AI auto-count, Estimate for pricing and proposals, and Build for field operations. It is used mainly by trade contractors and general contractors and integrates with QuickBooks, Sage, Acumatica, NetSuite, Procore and Autodesk.

  • As of October 2026, STACK's pricing page lists Takeoff & Estimate from $299 per user a month, Build & Operate from $49 per user a month and the full platform from $348 per user a month, all "as low as" prices, with a free version and a two-week trial. The page does not say which tiers include the AI takeoff features.

  • In STACK the estimator measures in a cloud tool and the AI counts symbols and suggests scope. In Mirage the agent produces the quantities from plan, section and detail sheets, each traced to its sheet, the estimator reviews them, and they feed the estimating system you already use. STACK is self-serve; Mirage is deployed and run by its own engineers.

  • STACK describes AI auto-counting of symbols, automatic identification of doors, windows, walls and rooms, and scope suggestions. Its integrations page also lists Workpack as an AI takeoff engine. It does not publish a takeoff-time or accuracy figure for these features.

  • Neither publishes a takeoff accuracy percentage. Mirage's case studies report time: 80 to 90% less on piping takeoff at John Cockerill, with every quantity traceable to its drawing at OCBM. STACK publishes no equivalent figure. The proof of concept on your own drawings is the test for Mirage; the trial is the test for STACK.

  • Mirage's agent feeds the estimating system the client already uses, wired by its engineers, and STACK offers API access. Whether that pairing fits a given team is settled in the proof of concept; nothing on this page claims a built connector.

Mirage for Construction Takeoff

Takeoff & Estimating

Mirage's AI agent reads plan, section and detail sheets together and returns quantities with their source attached, deployed by engineers who work inside your estimating workflow.

See takeoff and estimating

Show us the workflow that costs you the most time

Leave your work email, then pick a time for a 30-minute call. We look at one of your workflows together, and you leave with a written plan to automate it. No commitment.

We use your email to reply to you and, now and then, to tell you about Mirage. You can opt out at any time. Privacy policy