CONSTRUCTION INTELLIGENCE / TENDER RESPONSE
Send us an incoming tender package. Mirage extracts the requirements, deadlines, and disqualifiers, so your team decides whether to bid in 48 hours.
Running at OCBM and a US rail contractor.
THE REALITY
Tender packages arrive dense and time-pressured, and a first read is where a disqualifying requirement or a buried deadline is most likely to be missed. By the time it surfaces, the team has already spent days on a bid that was never viable.
WHAT MIRAGE DOES
01
Mirage reads incoming tenders whether they come as email, scanned documents, or native PDFs, and extracts requirements, deadlines, and scope in a structured format, no manual first pass required.
02
Hard requirements your team can't currently meet are surfaced individually, with the exact clause behind each one, so a bid/no-bid decision doesn't wait for a full read. Reads French-format tender documents, DCE and CCTP included, the same way it reads English-language ones.
03
Extracted requirements and deadlines drop into the proposal workflow your team already uses, or into Procore or Autodesk. No new tool for the bid team to learn.
THE OUTPUT
| Requirement | Type | Clause | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bid bond, 5% of contract value | Financial | Section 3.2 | Met |
| ISO 9001 certification | Qualification | Section 2.4 | Met |
| Prior experience, 3 similar projects in last 5 years↳ Company records show 2 comparable projects in the window, one short of the stated requirement. Flagged for the team to confirm before committing to bid. | Qualification | Section 2.6 | Disqualifier |
| Submission deadline | Deadline | Section 1.1 | 14 days from issue |
PROOF
OCBM
Measured quantities feed straight into bid pricing, helping OCBM respond to tenders faster
Dedicated agent cross-checks DCE, CCTP, and drawing revisions to surface discrepancies before submission
3 agents in production across takeoff, pricing, and document consistency
US Rail Contractor
31 spec-to-plan inconsistencies caught before inspection over 7 months
Every flagged item routed to the responsible PM or Superintendent
0 required post-inspection remediation on any flagged item
Send us a real incoming tender package, and we'll show you exactly what gets extracted and flagged.
FAQ
No. It extracts what a bid/no-bid decision needs, requirements, deadlines, and disqualifiers, in a fraction of the time a first read normally takes. Your team still makes the call.
Anything the tender states as a hard requirement your team can't currently meet: a certification, a bonding threshold, a licensing requirement, or a scope exclusion. Each one is flagged individually with the clause it came from.
Yes. It processes scanned documents, native PDFs, and mixed-format tender packages the same way, and reads French-format tender documents like DCE and CCTP the same way it reads English-language ones.
Every stated deadline, submission date, question period, and site visit window, is extracted and surfaced together, so nothing gets missed inside a long document.
No. It removes the first-read extraction work, not the strategy or the writing. Your team reviews every extracted requirement and disqualifier before deciding how to respond.
Yes. When a tender document contradicts itself, for example two sections stating different bonding thresholds, both are surfaced together so your team can resolve it before submission, not after.
Under four weeks on average to a production deployment, following the same audit-then-pilot approach as our other construction agents: indexing and setup first, then a parallel pilot on one real incoming tender.
Pricing starts with a fixed-price pilot run on one real incoming tender, so you see the extracted output before committing to anything larger. After that, it moves to an annual subscription priced by volume, quoted in your first conversation with us.
ALSO ON THIS SITE